Seized evidence subparagraphs 1 through 14 above shall be confiscated from the accused.

1. The telephone financial fraud assistance employee in the name of the 2019 Man-Ma203 is a person who obtains money from a public prosecutor or public prosecutor's office by misrepresenting to an unspecified number of victims and making them withdraw money from an account under the victim's name. The Defendant conspired to take charge of the act of remitting money to the account designated by the said organization after receiving the money, which was carried out by the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service according to the instructions of the officer in charge of financial affairs and was delivered with the money that was only withdrawn from the victim.

On December 14, 2018, an employee of the telephone financial fraud assistance against the victim C made a phone call to the victim, and misrepresenting the public prosecutor E of the department of the Supreme Prosecutors' Office and the F investigator of the Supreme Prosecutors' Office by making a phone call to the victim, and “in the course of investigation by arresting the criminal, the criminal was used for the crime in I using G bank in the name of the party, and H bank passbook. The victim is about 180 persons and the amount of damage is about 6 billion won. The victim must confirm whether he is a suspect or a victim, and then withdraw money from the H bank account and return money to the Financial Supervisory Service employee after checking on the face of the victim’s account.” Accordingly, the said employee made the victim withdraw 5.2 million won in cash from the J bank account in the name of the victim.

At around 14:00 on the same day, the Defendant saw the victim as an employee of the Financial Supervisory Service, and presented a document under the name of the Financial Supervisory Service, and had the victim sign at least 5,200,000 won in cash, and received a paper room from the victim.

B. On December 14, 2018, a member of the telephone financial fraud assistance service against the victim K calls the victim at an influence, who assumes the victim’s phone to the L inspection and M investigators at the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office D Department, misrepresenting the victim, and using the passbook in the name of the party.

In order to prove that the correspondence is a victim, the account shall be held.