2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine; 50.

The Defendant, at around 00:50 on September 13, 201, in line with the “E” main points for the operation of the victim D (E) on the 00:50 on September 13, 201, the Defendant was asked for drinking alcohol in combination with other customers, and was refused to request the victim to change the drinking value on credit, and thus, “this spath, vith” means “this spath, vith,” and “the 500 c) of the glass residues for beer (50 c), which is a dangerous object on the table, was placed on the table, and the beer and spath.

C. The two assaulted the victim by gathering the World Cup.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant's statement in the first trial record;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged areas;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 261 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

2. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

3. The defendant, on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, has been sentenced to one year to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective weapon, etc.), and has committed the instant crime using a dangerous object again on February 24, 2011, taking into account the elements of sentencing unfavorable to him/her, or the degree of damage suffered by him/her while under the influence of alcohol, is relatively minor, and the victim has agreed to do so.