In this case.

1. Summary of this part of the facts charged (so-called 2016 order 4671)

A. On October 11, 201, the Defendant: (a) around the “D” store run by the Defendant located in Asan-si C; and (b) around the victim E, the victim E lacks the cost of purchasing other fish at present.

In other words, because the store operation is well-grounded, it means to repay money to one month.

However, even if the defendant borrows money from the injured party, the defendant did not have the ability or intent to pay the money within the agreed time limit.

On October 13, 201, the Defendant received 15 million won from the injured party on deposit with the Defendant’s account under the name of the Defendant in the name of the borrowed money.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

B. On February 2014, the Defendant, in front of the “G sales” operated by the Defendant located in the Sinsan City F, the Defendant sought to add the business expansion to the victim at once.

One lot of burials on the river side of the river, and one lot of money would be left to the grring so that the grrings can live. If the grrings apartment owned by the grrings as security and loans money from the grrings, it would be done as soon as possible by combining the previous grrings.

“.......”

However, since there have been a large amount of debt in the process of opening several stores, the Defendant had been instructed to demand the repayment of the debt, so even if he borrowed money from the injured party, most of them did not have the intention or ability to make the injured party operate by setting up a new store, and there was no intention or intention to pay the borrowed money as soon as the injured party promised to do so.

Around February 10, 2014, the Defendant received KRW 70 million from the damaged party under the H’s account used by the Defendant as the borrowed money.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

(c)

The Defendant around April 2015.