특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치사)등
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.
However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for 3 years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A is a person engaged in driving a vehicle CK7.
On December 20, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car on December 23:55, 2017, and continued to drive the 453-lanes in front of the underground street of the 453 Ansan-si, Ansan-si, according to one-lanes in the direction of the new road in the beginning area.
At the time, commercial buildings were concentrated around the world, and the emergence of obstacles is anticipated. Thus, a driver engaged in driving duty has a duty of care to properly see the front section and the left and right, and to accurately manipulate the steering direction and the brake system, thereby preventing accidents.
Nevertheless, by negligence of neglecting this, the defendant neglected and proceeded as it is, the defendant's body part of the victim D (the age of 66) who crosses the left side from the right side of the defendant's running direction to the left side of the road.
Ultimately, the Defendant caused a traffic accident by occupational negligence as above, but did not immediately stop and take necessary measures, such as aiding the victim, and escaped, and caused the victim to die with low blood-related shocks and low oxygen symptoms caused by diversified damage during emergency transmission to E hospital at around 00:20 the following day.
2. Defendant B is a person engaging in driving a FYF rocketing car.
On December 21, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 00:03, and proceeded along the two-lanes in the direction of the new road in the front of the 453 Ansan-si's underground street as the center of the member of Ansan-si.
At the time, commercial buildings, etc. were located at night and around the area, and the emergence of obstacles is anticipated, so a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to check and drive the course safety by properly examining the boom.
Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so.