2. The judgment of the court below is recognized as the defendant's criminal act, and it is contrary to the victim's agreement during the investigation process, but it is acknowledged that the defendant suffered significant injury due to the shock of the driver's surface by negligence driving a motor vehicle in violation of the intersection signal. The crime of this case is not easy to say that the crime of this case is committed by the defendant, and all other circumstances, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, which are conditions for sentencing, are considered to be too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's argument is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.