정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
1. The defendant is not guilty. 2. The defendant will notify the defendant of the summary of the judgment.
(b)In the event that a summary order has been issued for a complainant due to a violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation), to slander the complainant;
1. On February 20, 2013, using the pen name “E” at the bottom of its sales text on the Internet Csite around 12:04, “DC is recognized by the Daegu District Law as guilty of defamation and became aware of the fact of a fine, and the chests were faced with a fine. It continues to be on the spot, for whom there is no anti-debris, and on the other hand, she will be provokinged, and she will continue to be on the spot.” By posting a letter, “E” at the end of its sales text on the Internet Csite, thereby impairing the reputation of the complainant by openly pointing out the fact.
2. 2013. 2. 22. 00:21경 위 C 사이트에 고소인이 작성한 “뭐씨와의 블랙 코미디”라는 제목의 글 하단에 ‘E’이라는 필명을 이용하여 댓글 형식으로, “이제 법원 판결이 났습니다. D씨는 명예훼손 혐의로 유죄 판결로 벌금형에 처해졌으며, 사기, 이놈저놈, 개**, 씨*놈 등 차마 입에 담기 어려운 쌍말로 대하고 마치 환불을 거부하는 것처럼 치부하여 사기꾼인양 하여 심대한 상처를 받았습니다. 굼뱅이도 밟아보시지요.”라는 글을 게시함으로써, 공연히 사실을 적시하여 고소인의 명예를 훼손하고,
3. On February 22, 2013, around 01:27, the title “Intermediate Report on DC’s Cyber Violence of 12/12/13, 12/16, 12/18” was posted on the bulletin board of the above C site, and “A person himself/herself against the above cyber terrorism was not against his/her own objection but against his/her offense of defamation, and he/she was found guilty by the Daegu District Court, thereby impairing the reputation of the complainant by openly pointing out facts.”
2. Determination
A. “Purpose of slandering people” as stipulated in Article 70(1) and (2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. refers to the intention of harming people.