A. Defendant C shall pay KRW 300,000,000 as well as 25% per annum from January 30, 2015 to the date of full payment.

A. On October 2014, Defendant D’s crime 1), G, Defendant D, etc.: (a) the wife population H, I, J, and K’s four parcels of real estate (hereinafter “instant real estate”) owned by Defendant D and Dong-person D (living in 1931) around G, Defendant D, etc.

(B) Defendant D (former E: hereinafter referred to as “Defendant D”) by taking advantage of the fact that the resident registration number D (former E: hereinafter referred to as “Defendant D”) was not indicated in the column for ownership transfer registration.

(2) Defendant D conspired to arbitrarily dispose of the instant real estate by means of pretending to be the owner of the instant real estate after being named in the name as D(1931) and pretending to be the owner of the instant real estate. (2) Defendant D conspiredd to arbitrarily dispose of the instant real estate by stating his name as “E” to be named as “D”, and issued a resident registration certificate under the name named as “E”. In order to ensure that the address, date of transfer, etc. of the abstract of the instant real estate coincide with the address of D(1931) as the real owner of the instant real estate, the address, date of transfer, etc. in the descriptions of the abstract of the resident registration record card in Seongdong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City L, 1972-108, 1972-10-8 transfer, and (2) as “Seoul-do M, 1974-03, 1974-05-03 transfer”.

B. Defendant C’s ownership transfer registration process of the instant real estate 1) Defendant C is a certified judicial scrivener who operates a certified judicial scrivener’s office at the time of the Government. (2) Defendant D, who pretended to be the owner of the instant real estate as seen earlier, delegated Defendant D, the person liable for registration to file an application for ownership transfer registration with Defendant C, the person liable for registration, the grounds for registration, and the date of registration to be sold on December 18, 2014, and presented Defendant D’s resident registration certificate, the abstract of the forged resident registration record card, as seen earlier, and the certificate of registration lost.

3. Defendant F knows the forgery of the above documents.