2. Although the Defendant was committed against the Defendant at the time of committing the instant crime, the sum of the damage amount to the instant crime was not less than KRW 30 million, the damage was not recovered in addition to KRW 1,00,000,000, which was paid to the Samchip Co., Ltd. (crime List 20). The lower court already sentenced to the maximum sentence regarding limited imprisonment among the applicable sentencing range through discretionary mitigation, and in addition, considering the Defendant’s age, character, character and environment, means and consequence, and the conditions of sentencing as indicated in the instant argument, such as the circumstances after the crime, it is deemed that the Defendant’s punishment imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable. Thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, it is apparent that the second and fifth acts of the judgment of the court below "afford" in the second and fifth acts are erroneous statements in "afford or stolen," and thus, it is corrected ex officio in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure.