건조물침입등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The sentence of the lower court (two years and six months of imprisonment, and four years of suspended execution) and the incidental disposition (the observation of protection between two years, taking lectures to treat sexual assault for 80 hours, disclosing to the public, and notifying 4 years) are too unreasonable to determine the amount of the punishment.
2. The sentencing conditions have no particular change compared to those of the lower court because a new sentencing data was not submitted in the appellate court’s judgment.
In full view of all the sentencing factors revealed at the trial of this case, the lower court’s punishment is excessively heavy to the extent that it exceeded the reasonable discretion of the court.
It does not seem that it does not appear.
Therefore, this part of the defendant's argument is without merit.
3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed on the ground that the conclusion is without merit.