beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2020.12.17 2020나58745

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) On January 1, 2017, the Plaintiff is the Korea Asset Corporation and the Jinju-si, D,205 square meters prior to D (hereinafter “instant land”).

(2) The Plaintiff entered into a loan agreement with the purport that the loan period is extended from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2021. 2) The Plaintiff is using a parking lot (large 3 meters and 15 meters in length; hereinafter “instant parking lot”) installed on the ground of the instant land and the instant land for the purpose of taking out agricultural products, loading agricultural materials, etc. from the plastic houses installed on the ground of the instant land, which are located on a part of the instant land and the instant parking lot (large 3 meters and 15 meters in length; hereinafter “instant parking lot”).

3) The Defendants used four vehicles for farming purposes in F and G land adjacent to the instant land. From around October 2018 to around July 2019, the Defendants parked two vehicles in the said FF, G land, or the instant parking lot instead of the said four vehicles in lieu of the said four vehicles, and interfered with the Plaintiff’s spraying of composts and shipping of crops by blocking the Plaintiff’s greenhouse entrance entrance. 4) The Plaintiff was unable to use the vehicle owned by the Plaintiff in the course of shipping agricultural products to the relation with the use of the instant parking lot, and was forced to sell the vehicle to the said vehicle after loading the vehicle to the HF joint wholesale market. As such, the Plaintiff was unable to use the vehicle owned by the Plaintiff in the course of shipping the agricultural products to the point of using the instant parking lot, the Plaintiff was forced to load the said vehicle with the transportation cost. From around around October 2018, around 1, 2018, around 1,156,1500,3052,244 of the Defendants’ mental suffering.

Therefore, the Defendants are liable to compensate for damages suffered by the Plaintiff due to such unlawful obstruction of business.

5) Therefore, the Defendants are jointly obligated to pay the total sum of KRW 3,052,244 and KRW 10,000 and KRW 13,052,244, and delay damages.

B. According to each of the statements in Eul, Nos. 11 and 12, the plaintiff is the plaintiff.