When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant committed the following crimes on the grounds that the Defendant, like the workplace rent, had mistakenly performed a daily treatment from the workplace company, and had brupted by the workplace company.

1. On October 20, 2014, the Defendant: (a) destroyed property by entering the 296 Ansan-gu Masan-ro, a member of Ansan-si, an automated copic, into the cash withdrawal 296 Ansan-si, an automated copic, and then destroyed the parts equivalent to approximately KRW 30,000,00 of the vehicle, by walking with the string of the specifications of cash transaction managed by the employees B of the company banks, such as strings, strings, large-scale fire extinguishings, entrances, etc.

2. Around 22:40 on October 20, 2014, the Defendant, within the Ansan-si Police Station D police box of the Ansan-si, a member C, was arrested as a flagrant offender under the suspicion of the above 1.1. On the following occasions, the Defendant publicly insulting E by means of spiting, cutting off on the floor, spiting, cutting off, or cutting down the bit of a bitch on the floor, with the view of “a police officer who is a police officer,” among the police officers B, etc. who were arrested as a flagrant offender under the suspicion of the above 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A victim summary statement in preparation B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing internal photographs of bank withdrawals;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, selection of a fine (aggravating a person), and selection of a fine (aggravating a person who is led to the confession of and against the defendant, recovery of damage to a victim of damage to property, and a defendant has no specific penalty power except once a fine is imposed, etc.).

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.