The written indictment of this part of the victim E (Representative F) and the victim H operated by the victim G is indicated as “victim H (business operator G).” However, this part of the indictment is merely merely limited to the trade name of the business operator operated by G, and the Defendants and their defense counsel are disputing only the business assets of the data leaked. As above, even if the above correction was made without any amendment to the indictment, it would hinder the Defendants’ exercise of their defense rights.

As such, the above correction is not made.

A. A company is a company that distributes industrial expendable goods, such as log mats, in the form of a business entity that shares and operates both the I building and the human and material resources of the 302 site. Defendant B is a company that purchases industrial expendable goods from October 27, 2015 to March 24, 2016, while performing duties in the victim E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “victim Co., Ltd”) and H’s purchase of materials, such as tapes, from around March 24, 2016 to around March 24, 2016, while performing duties in the part of the materials and materials purchased from the victim Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “victim Co., Ltd.”) and H, the company is a company that performs wholesale business for industrial consumption with the trade name “K” from around March 24, 2016 to around November 5, 2015 to May 28, 2016.

Victims' list of business partners related to industrial expendable goods, such as tapes, purchase-related data (purchase points, purchase costs, estimates, etc.), sales-related data (sales prices, unit prices by item, transaction volume, sales details by company, estimates, etc.) are major business assets secured by victims' companies and H through discovery of business partners and price negotiations for a long period of time, and are leaked to victims' companies and H.