When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 20, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud in the branch court of Suwon District Court on July 20, 2012, and completed the execution of the above punishment on January 17, 2013.

1. Fraud;

A. On February 2013, the Defendant stated that “In the E-cafeteria located in D, which is operated by the Victim C, the victim means that “The representative director of G Housing, the owner of which is the building in constructing a cafeteria in the vicinity of the restaurant, is the owner of the G Housing, the owner of which is the owner of the building, and the owner of the G Housing, who provides meals to the members of the construction site, will give monthly the cost of the meals to the members of the building site.” On May 1, 2013 of the same year, the Defendant received several demands from the victim to demand that the victim pay the accrued meal costs from the victim at the above restaurant.” The Defendant said that “The victim will settle all if he is aware of, and will later borrow 1 bonds as a substitute.”

However, as seen above, the Defendant was released from the prison immediately after the Defendant was released from the prison, and not only did not have any occupation but also did not have any particular property, and the FNNL also should be lent the full amount of expenses, including the cost of construction, to others, and thus, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the cost, even if he was provided with meals from the victim.

Ultimately, the Defendant, as above, deceiving the victim as above, received meals from the victim from the first police officer of February 2013 from the victim, and in such a manner as described in the attached list of crimes, the Defendant committed the same in such manner as stated in the attached list of crimes.

6. Until 18. A total of 2,255,500 won was provided with meals.

B. On April 30, 2013, the Defendant stated, “Around April 30, 2013, the Defendant would lend money to the victim to pay the victim one month after lending money to the construction site.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have an intention or ability to repay the same amount as the victim promised, even if he borrowed money from the victim in the same condition as the statement in paragraph 1(a).

Ultimately, the Defendant is above.