A. The sentence imposed by the lower court (one year of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

B. The above sentence declared by the prosecutor by the court below is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. As to each of the unlawful arguments of sentencing by the Defendant and the prosecutor, it is recognized that the Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without being aware of the period of repeated crime due to interference with the same kind of duties, etc., even though the Defendant was sentenced to a fine, suspension of execution, and punishment, and even if having been committed, the Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without being aware of the period of repeated crime due to interference with the same kind of duties, etc., the crime was committed with the crime of this case, which was committed with the crime of this case, and the form of each of the crimes of this case, and the methods and methods, etc.

However, considering the facts that the Defendant led to the confession of the crime, the amount of damage to property is not so significant, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of each of the instant crimes, etc., and the scope of recommended sentencing guidelines for the enactment of the Supreme Court sentencing committee, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the Defendant is deemed appropriate, and it does not seem unfair because it is too heavy or too heavy.

Therefore, each argument of the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.