2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On June 4, 2014, the Plaintiff, who worked for the entire C market, was a d party recommendation to run the C market during the 6th nationwide provincial election. The Defendant was elected on the recommendation of the E-party.

B. On May 26, 2014, the Internet newspaper F press reporter G published an article (hereinafter “instant article”) stating that “IC’s wife transferred KRW 50 million to the Plaintiff’s copied the Plaintiff’s copied the amount of KRW 4.95 billion from JC to the investment fraud,” along with the content of “IC’s wife transferred KRW 50 million to the Plaintiff’s copied account” (hereinafter “instant article”).

However, in fact, the reporter G published a corrected article that read, “the Plaintiff’s her dynamics wired KRW 50 million to IC’s wife,” after approximately 30 minutes of the publication of the first article, and deleted the article as the Plaintiff’s claim after about 8 hours of publication.

C. On May 28, 2014, at around 10:00, the Defendant made a reply to the reporter who cited the instant article (hereinafter “instant reporter conference”) as the title “K” (hereinafter “instant reporter conference”) and distributed the same content of the news report to the reporters, and posted it on the Defendant’s website.

2014. 5. 28. 오후에는 피고 명의의 휴대전화를 통하여 ”A 현 시장 또다시 측근 비리 의혹(H 부지 관련)“ 언론보도, ”A C시장 측근 I씨, 40억 대 사기 혐의로 검찰에 고발당해“, ”A 시장 친동생 계좌로 측근 I씨 아내가 5천만 원 송금 “, 현 시장의 계속되는 측근 비리와 의혹에 인내심의 한계를 느낍니다.

I urge the prosecution to conduct the prompt investigation, and propose B to resolve B’s market vision and C’s “C’s officials”.

The same text messages as above (hereinafter “the instant text messages”) were sent to voters.

The sum of the above acts is .....