2. The judgment is based on the following facts: (a) the defendant recognized the facts charged in this case; (b) some damaged items were returned to the victim H; and (c) some damages were paid to the victimO; (c) although it is recognized that the quality of the crime is not good in light of the methods of each of the crimes in this case, the number of crimes, and the amount of damages; (d) the defendant was unable to agree with the victims up to the trial; (e) the defendant was subject to juvenile protective disposition several times, including one time of suspended sentence for the same larceny; (e) the defendant began to commit the crime in this case; (g) there was no special change in circumstances that could change the sentence of the court below after the decision of the court below was made; and (e) the defendant's age, sex, and environment, and other various circumstances revealed in the records and arguments, the defendant's assertion is not reasonable because the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.