From July 16, 2015, 09:06 on 09:06 on 16, 2015, an employee of the Singishing was called to the victim C, and “I will change the prosecutor because I were involved in the case.

“Along with the victim’s continuous phone call, F was used for the crime of opening a bankbook, one of the one’s own names, which was the victim.

It shall be examined as to whether the head of the Tong has been lent.

G website refers to “.. Access to the G site”, and the phrase “the number, name, and password, etc. of a company bank should be entered and the OTP number should be verified by security” to the victim who access the above site, and then the victim identified the financial information of the company bank account of the victim from the victim, and then transferred KRW 28 million from the victim’s company bank account to the Defendant’s company bank account (H) around 14:32 on the same day.

As above, Defendant 1 aided and abetted the commission of fraud, such as the computer, etc. of the Defendant’s name-free singinging employees, by providing information on the account number of the Defendant’s bank to the singing employee in order to assist the commission of the above crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 347-2 and 32 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The crime of fraud, such as the reasons for sentencing Article 32(2) and Article 55(1)3(3) of the Criminal Act for statutory mitigation, constitutes a crime of “scaming” as referred to in the instant case, on a systematic and planned basis, for an unspecified number of victims, not only causes serious damage to a large number of victims, but also is not easy to recover damage.