However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

No one shall engage in business of exchanging or arranging exchange or repurchase tangible or intangible results, such as points and premiums obtained through the use of game products.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, on the second floor of the D Building D, operated a game hall in such a way that the sum of 40 and 180,000 won in cash and 180,000 won in cash were continuously accumulated in the IDs of customers and exchanged the accumulated game scores to customers in cash in the same amount. However, on August 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) opened 40 and 25 games in the EM game machine; (b) opened 40 and 25 games in the EM game machine; (c) opened 10,000 won in the EM game machine; and (d) opened 180,000 won in the EM game machine; and (d) opened 1 June 1, 2014 to August 5, 2014, the Defendant saved the game hall in the same way as the result of the business for customers without the use of the game machine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal affairs (Attachment of video files and caps);

1. Relevant Article of the relevant criminal facts, and Articles 44 (1) 2 and 32 (1) 7 of the Act on the Selection of Punishment and Promotion of Game Industry;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Consideration of the violation of reasons for sentencing under Article 44(2) of the Act on the Promotion of Confiscation Industry, Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act, the fact that there are no criminal records of the same kind, and the size and business period of the game of this case;