2. In full view of the following: (a) the Defendant led to the confession and reflect of the instant crime; (b) the victim was recovered from the damage caused by the instant crime; and (c) the victim did not want to be punished for the Defendant; (b) the circumstances and details of the instant crime; (c) the record of criminal punishment was defective; (d) the fact that there was a history of criminal punishment on two or more occasions; and (e) other factors of sentencing as indicated in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age and behavior environment, the amount of embezzlement, and the circumstances before and after the instant crime, the lower court’s punishment against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.