손해배상(의)
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants exceeding the money ordered to be paid under the following subparagraphs shall be revoked.
1. The reasoning for this part of this Court’s ruling is the same as the reasoning for the judgment of the first instance except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, this part of this Court’s ruling is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
The defendants added the following parts between the parts of the court's 9, 15, 17, 18, 8, 12, 10 and 4, respectively, to the court of first instance, and the part of the court's 6th 4th 4th 5th 10th 7th 4th 4th 4th 6th 6th 6th 6th 5th 6th 6th 6th 5th 6th 6th 6th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 5th 4th 4th 5th 6th 4th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 600. The defendants asserted that the defendants did not have any opinion on the left side of the plaintiff's 2nd 3rd 4th 2nd 1st 3th 6th 4th 6th 6th 3th 2.
However, the evidence Nos. 8 and 3-5 of evidence Nos. 3, the result of the request for the examination of medical records to the head of the Seoul Hospital at the Hanyang University, the result of the fact-finding conducted by the court of first instance, and the overall purport of the arguments, are considered as follows. In other words, even in the case where the satisfying of the satisfy in the Hanyang University University, the satisfying of the satisfy in the s