A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for ten months.

[Criminal Justice] On November 10, 2010, Defendant B sentenced 10 months to imprisonment with prison labor for the acquisition of stolen goods in the Seoggu District Court’s Branch Branch, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Daegu Prison on September 9, 2011.

【Criminal Facts】

On July 8, 2012, at around 01:20, the Defendants discovered that, while drunkly drunkd in the E parking lot located in Seogugu-gu, Daegu, the victim F was seated, and then smoked on the floor of the wall, the Defendant A saw the victim’s wall, while escapeing from the victim’s wall, and the Defendant B escaped.

As a result, the Defendants, together, stolen 370,00 won in cash owned by the victim, 370,000 won in agricultural credit cards, 2, 1 physical card of the National Bank and Daegu Bank, and 1 copy in the verification color that contain resident registration certificates.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. The statement of the witness H in the legal statement (defendant B) and the third protocol of the trial (defendant A);

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of Defendant B by the prosecution;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against Defendants and G

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. A statement prepared by H;

1. Data on communication and social communications, investigation report (B), investigation report (J), investigation report (in relation to the result of analyzing the details of cell phone numbers), investigation report (Attachment to a copy of a meeting with a detained person), recording and recording report, investigation report (the details of cell phone calls of a suspect G);

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, etc. inquiry reports, investigation reports (a written judgment and confinement status attached), - the personal identification status, - Three copies of judgment convictions;

1. The defendant A asserts that he/she independently committed a crime, and the defendant B did not commit a crime.

2. However, in full view of all the circumstances acknowledged by the above evidence duly adopted and examined as well as the following circumstances, it was proven that there was no reasonable doubt as to the Defendants committed the crime as stated in the facts constituting the crime.