However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who has worked as an employee from “D” in the operation of the victim C in Bupyeong-gu, Seocheon-gu.

At around 16:00 on January 18, 2013, the Defendant: (a) stolen the victim’s cell phone 11 mobile phone 16 million won in total in the market price owned by the victim in another cell phone display space; and (b) arbitrarily sold the victim’s cell phone 4.645,00 won to E, who is the purchaser of a mobile cell phone, by taking out 11 mobile phone 16 million won in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. A written statement of C and E;

1. Application of a copy of a sales contract;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( comprehensively taking into account all the circumstances, such as the following: (a) the motive and means of crime in this case; (b) the age and happiness environment of the defendant; (c) the confession and reflect of the crime in this case; (d) there is no record of punishment for the same crime; and (e) deposit of KRW 3

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;