소유권말소등기
The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and the purport of the appeal are the judgment of the first instance.
1. The reasons for the acceptance by the court of first instance are as follows. The reasons for the acceptance by the court of first instance are as follows, and except for the addition of the following "2. Additional Determination" as to the allegations emphasized or added by the plaintiff in this court, the reasons for the rejection by the court of first instance are as follows, and thus, they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
J. 2 7 Happing “H” shall be written in the form of “E”.
3. 8 Pursuant to the attached list, “The instant real estate” has been cut to “the real estate listed in the attached list (hereinafter referred to as “the instant real estate”).
4 11 p.m. 14 p.m. 14 p.m. “only the testimony of K and H is made” means “each testimony of K and H is made only by the testimony of K and H in the first instance trial.”
2. The Plaintiff asserts to the effect that the registration is null and void, on the ground that the seller’s column telephone number stated in the real estate sale contract (No. 20 No. 20) submitted at the time of registration was G, G voluntarily made against the Plaintiff’s will.
According to the evidence evidence No. 63, a certified judicial scrivener Q has been engaged in the affairs for which a registration has been made through the introduction of GIST; the seller column of the above sales contract can be recognized as the fact that Q Q’s staff members had tamped; and the fact that the plaintiff obtained a certificate of personal seal impression for sale to which the defendant was the buyer and delivered to GIST is that the plaintiff himself was issued a certificate of personal seal impression for sale.
(b)as set forth in (2).
According to this, the entry of the G phone number in the seller column of the sales contract seems to have been known that Q Q had been delegated by the plaintiff, and the seller's phone number was wrong to his/her employees in the course of handling the business.
Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.
3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit.
The judgment of the first instance is just to conclude this conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is groundless.