과실치상
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant resides in Jeju City B and combines ma in Ma. On September 12, 2013, the Defendant neglected the management of 11:34 on the 12nd day of the 2013rd day, which led to damage to the victim C (the age of 67) where the opening is running outside the house and the opening is running outside the house, thereby leading to the victim C (the age of 67) where the opening is running.
2. The facts charged cannot be punished against the victim’s express intent under Article 266(1) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, it is recognized that the victim submitted a written agreement on January 27, 2013, which was after the prosecution of this case, that the victim would not be punished. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.
It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.