However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 30, 2015, at around 00:30, the Defendant: (a) committed assault to the slope E and the horse F, who was called out after receiving a report of 112 at the Busan District CBD parking lot, in order to keep the patrol vehicle back to KRW 10,000,000; (b) obstructed the patrol vehicle; and (c) assaulted the instant E’s right slope, the instant E’s right slope buck, the bridge, the bridge, and the side buck.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers in relation to 112 reporting management affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] The suspension of execution of imprisonment shall be sentenced on the condition of community service, taking into account the following: (a) the basic area (6-1 year and April) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6-1 year and April) (no person who has been specially punished]; (b) the decision on the suspension of execution of imprisonment is not much severe than the degree of interference with official duties