When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

[Criminal record] On October 13, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Jeonju District Court on October 20, 2017 and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 20, 2017.

[Criminal facts] The Defendant: (a) around 12:05 on June 11, 2017, the gold that the victim D operated by the victim D in Asan-si, Asan-si around 12:05, operated by the victim D is urgent to the victim in the room, and (b) the victim first changed the son’s son’s son and son’s son’s son’s son’s

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant had no intention or ability to pay the victim from the beginning.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceiving the victim as above and acquired the precious metal from the victim, i.e., the victim's 474,000 won at the market price from the seat, i.e., the victim's e., the victim's e.g., the e., the victim

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Details of purchase;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Inquiries about criminal history, text of judgment, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report criminal investigations;

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment by fraud, etc. at the Daejeon District Court on April 11, 2016, and completed the execution of the sentence and committed the same crime during the period of repeated offense, and that the Defendant is not liable for repeating the offense even if he/she was punished as many as the same military force as the above repeated offense, in addition to the aforesaid repeated offense, is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

However, on October 13, 2017, the defendant recognized the facts of the crime of this case and expressed his intention against the mistake, and on October 13, 2017, this court was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. and its judgment became final and conclusive around that time.