If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 18:10 on January 21, 2013, the Defendant, in front of the C cafeteria located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, on the ground that the victim D (Nam, 46 years of age) excavated without a brucation to the Defendant, the Defendant: (a) was fluencated; (b) was flucated one time per head of the victim’s fluor; (c) continued to open a driver’s door according to the victim’s car; and (d) continued to have the victim’s flue part of the victim’s kne, kne, kne, kne, and kne, knife the victim’s kne, and knife the victim’s flue part of the victim’s kne; and (d) was flucing the victim

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement Nos. 1 and 2 times with regard to D;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. The photographic site;

1. Application of the legislation in its opinion;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the nature of the crime is not good in light of the method of and degree of damage to the crime committed on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order, and the circumstances after the crime are not good, such as requesting a witness to be present at the investigative agency during the investigation process after the crime. Meanwhile, the Defendant appears to be contrary to the Defendant’s favorable sentencing factors, considering the fact that the confession of the crime in this case appears to be contrary to the Defendant’s favorable sentencing factors, the Defendant shall be given a full consideration of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive and circumstance of the crime, etc.,