However, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, as against Defendant B and C.

1. On July 5, 201, the Defendants discovered the YF small-scale car driven by Defendant C in the steering line of the GYF small-scale passenger car operated by Defendant B in the general passage near the Koyang-gu, Yangyang-gu, Yangyang-si, and caused an accident by discovering the YF small-scale car driven by Defendant C, while waiting in the back seat while Defendant A was waiting in the presence of each other, the H driving along the said general traffic route was driven by the said vehicle.

Although the Defendants did not differ from the above accidents, they were hospitalized at a hospital, and thereafter caused the above accident to the victim Mz Fire, Inc., the insurance company of H, due to the negligence of H. Accordingly, the Defendants were required to report as if the Defendants were different, and Defendant A was paid KRW 1,483,130 to the victim corporation, and KRW 1,876,940 to the victim corporation, and KRW 1,575,680 to the victim corporation, and KRW 1,575,680 to the victim corporation, respectively.

As a result, the Defendants conspired in collusion to receive insurance money of KRW 4,935,750 in total by deceiving the victim merts fire.

2. Defendant B and C’s co-principal conduct

A. On April 28, 2010, around 04:52, the Defendants: (a) discovered a LMNF small-scale car running along the above general traffic route while waiting in the back seat by Defendant B and Defendant C while waiting in the middle seat; (b) suffered an accident by the Defendants facing a part of the above passenger car with which the Defendants were on board.

Even if the Defendants and J did not deal with the above accident, they were hospitalized in a hospital, and thereafter caused the above accident to the victim merz fire, which is an insurance company, due to the negligence of L, and accordingly, caused the Defendants and J to report as if they were. The agreement is reached from the victim Mez fire.