The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the court of first instance, the court below’s determination that the charged facts of this case are guilty on the grounds as stated in its holding is just, and there is no error of law by misunderstanding facts beyond the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules or by violating the principle of evidence trial or strict certification.

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.