2. The judgment has a favorable condition for the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant's mistake is recognized, the amount of damage is not so large, and the relevant provision was deleted by the amendment of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, which was originally applied to the defendant, and the defendant was punished by habitual larceny under the minor Criminal Act through the amendment of the Act, while the defendant has a favorable condition for the defendant, such as the fact that there was a history of punishment several times for the same crime, most of the damage has not been recovered, and there are unfavorable circumstances for the defendant. Furthermore, considering all the sentencing conditions in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, family relationship, circumstance, method, frequency, size, and circumstances after the crime, etc., even if considering the favorable circumstances for the defendant as seen earlier, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.