When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 14:00 on June 6, 2015, the Defendant, while driving a taxi for business use in B rocketing and driving in the direction to keep the traffic signal crosssection from the luminous intersection in the direction to keep it from the luminous intersection, the Defendant suffered damage to the right side part of the Drare car driven by the victim C (Nam, 47 years old) who is driving in the direction of the direction to be organized on the surface of the flood according to normal signal due to the negligence in the course of business, even though the driving signal was a stop signal while the driving signal was in progress, from the normal signal, while the traffic signal was installed at the luminous intersection at the luminous intersection, and suffered from about 4 weeks damage to the victim E (the victim, the passenger of the Defendant, and 36 years old) who is the passenger of the vehicle, for about 2 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the medical certificate (E);

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is the defendant's primary crime, the reflection of the sentencing, and the non-injury (in the case of the victim C, four weeks diagnosis have been conducted, but in light of the background of the accident, the degree of damage of the damaged vehicle, the statement made by the victim C, etc., the injury appears to be minor) etc.