2. The circumstances favorable to the Defendant are recognized, such as the Defendant’s deep reflects on the instant crime, the Defendant’s accommodation in PC room, soup, soup, soup, etc., where there is no place of residence after release, and the amount of damage is less than the amount of damage.

However, it is necessary to respect the judgment of the court below because there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared with the court below because new sentencing data have not been submitted in the trial at the court below. The defendant repeated the crime of this case during the period of repeated crimes for which 4 months have not yet passed since he had been sentenced to larceny and was released from prison due to larceny; the crime of this case is identical to the Act on the thief criminal conviction and the crime of this case; the victim committed repeated crimes against many unspecified victims; the victim did not agree with the victim; and the details and result of the crime of this case, and other various circumstances, which are conditions for the sentencing specified in the records and arguments of this case, including the circumstances after the crime, character and conduct of the defendant, environment, age, etc., the sentencing of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.