When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 26, 2011, the Defendant: (a) entrusted the victim C with the construction of an apartment dance (building) at the D office of the construction business chain operated by the Defendant, a complainant in the Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si; (b) there is no cost such as accommodation expenses

“A person who believed this shall be granted five million won in cash from the person who has believed it as a result of borrowing money.”

However, even if the defendant completed the apartment dancing construction in Gwangju, he did not have the intent or ability to pay the victim the money borrowed from the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim and acquired 5 million won as the borrowed money.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (the confirmation report of Defendant’s economic condition);

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.