2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. Defendant F’s senior mother H (I) who is a doctor in the heart of the Defendant F, complained of symptoms that “at the time when they booms and do so,” and applied to the J Hospital (Defendant E’s operation) working for Defendant F on June 11, 2012.

B. Defendant F performed a comprehensive examination, such as a blood test on the day of internal origin, a heart test, a chest X-ray test, and a comprehensive examination with respect to cryposis following the following crypology, such as an crypryprypryprypryprypryprypryprypryprypryprypryp

C. As a result of the inspection, it was in a state of pharmacologic treatment by showing the narrow state of 30-40% and the narrow state of 40-50% even not being operated. However, as a result of engaging in pharmacologic treatment, it was confirmed that it was very serious congested state of 9%.

Accordingly, Defendant F determined that the situation of the compromise is likely to be dangerous if the procedure was not performed as soon as possible, considering the opinion consistent with the “easting symptoms”, and that Defendant G (Ap. 270 times) invited Defendant G (C. 2) with extensive experience in the operation of the parallel beer in heart (Ap. 270 times) and requested to perform the procedure for H. The Defendant G carried out the scopical extension of the parallel beer’s right-hand beer in the middle of the same month and the scopic insertion inserted in the scopic.

E. After the procedure, the observation showed two pains and the left-hand macysis to H, and the result of taking CT with respect to two parts according to the opinion of the relevant medical specialist, found that there was no more than anything on the place of the procedure, but the outside of the body of the procedure confirmed that cerebrovassis occurred at the blood hospital, and that there was a tendency to increase the volume of cerebrssis after the lapse of one hour, H transferred her to the Chungcheongnamnam University Hospital to perform an emergency operation, but H was not broken down and died on July 7, 2012. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 23888, Jul. 7, 2012>

F. The Plaintiff A’s wife, Plaintiff B, C, and D of the deceased (hereinafter “the deceased”) are the children of the deceased.