상해
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant, in a restaurant, brought the victim out of the restaurant, who breath of alcohol, and although the Defendant did not have inflicted an injury by assaulting the victim as stated in the facts charged of this case, he was guilty of the facts charged of this case, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case and affected the conclusion of the judgment.
2. The judgment of the court below is consistent with the facts charged in this case, i.e., ① the victim made a statement from the investigative agency to the court below's court consistent with the evidence duly adopted and investigated. ② The victim visited the hospital due to symptoms of scarbing on March 5, 2014, on the date of the occurrence of this case, by visiting the hospital due to the symptoms of scarbry and scarbing, etc., diagnosed the victim's injury diagnosis (in 7, 44 pages) and the motive and circumstance of the dispute between the defendant and the victim. ③ In particular, the victim's statement is credibility in the victim's statement in light of the following circumstances: < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 25174, Mar. 1, 2014; Presidential Decree No. 20648, Feb. 24, 200; Presidential Decree No. 20607, Feb. 24, 200>