However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 22:00 on August 13, 2019, the Defendant received 112 reports on the fact that gambling is being performed at a restaurant located in Pyeongtaek-si B, and received a request for confirmation of the details and identity of 112 report from the slope affiliated with the Pyeongtaek-si Police Station Down Police Station, which called, “I see this ice, I see why I see, and I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see the above E.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports and criminal investigations by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act Article 62(1) of the Suspension of Execution is that in that police officers dispatched to the site with the reason for the sentencing of the Criminal Act are defeasible and used violence, their criminal liability is not easy

However, the punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of favorable circumstances, such as the fact that there has been no history of criminal punishment during the last ten years, confession and reflect of the crime in this case, and the fact that it is a contingent crime.