손해배상(산)
1. The Defendants jointly share 18,571,428 won, Plaintiff B, and C respectively to Plaintiff A 38,716,568 won, Plaintiff D, and E 2,500.
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. Facts of recognition 1) The network I (hereinafter “the network”) of the instant accident occurred
) Defendant H, who was employed by Defendant H, and placed an order at the window of Changwon-si, for the installation of a sign indicating the parking surface and sign. On June 16, 2014, around 14:00, Defendant H had been working on the site of “the installation of a sign indicating the parking surface and sign indicating the parking surface” at the window of Changwon-si, Changwon-si, the window of Changwon-si, the window of Changwon-si, which was about 50cm in diameter, was back to the road, to correct this. As such, Defendant G’s Kacra (K; hereinafter “the instant screen”).
) In order to correct and fix the sign installed in the container, it lost a balance among automatic Hands, and cut down by the floor below approximately 4.5 meters away from the burners. The deceased, during the fall, she was deprived of the safety cap and faced with her head on the floor, and died at around 20:28 on the same day (hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”). The deceased died on the same day while being treated after being transported to the hospital by suffering from the injury, such as the balke, and was transported to the hospital.
2) In the instant case, the instant neck structure is open to allow one side to embark and disembark, and safety belts for the prevention of fall at the time of filing a complaint. At the time of the instant accident, safety belts were installed without installing safety belts.
Safety belts are installed at a height of about 90 cm from the clacker floor.
3) Among the parties, Plaintiff A’s spouse, Plaintiff B, and C are the deceased’s children, Plaintiff D, and E are the parents of the deceased, and Plaintiff F are the births of the deceased. The Defendant limited liability company’s Cheongdo Cargo is the employer of Defendant G, and the owner of the instant Cwre. 4) Defendant H’s criminal judgment against Defendant H is necessary to provide safety education to the deceased in relation to the instant accident, and to prevent the risk of fall.