When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 26, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the Busan Metropolitan City Police Station civil petition office located in 692, as the plane captain in Busan Metropolitan City, on the plane captain; (b) at the Busan Metropolitan City, the Defendant asked C to sell the ckacker C’s cacker (hereinafter “the cacker”) owned by the Defendant; and (c) although, on April 26, 201, C asked C to sell it, the Defendant filed a complaint with C; (d) on the construction site located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; and (e) at the construction site located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; and (e) by taking advantage of the gap in surveillance of the cacker C, the Defendant filed a charge stating false facts, thereby punishing C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. E prosecutorial statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the written accusation;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 156 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion that the defendant and his defense counsel only left the clock clacker disposal to E, and they did not leave the above disposition to C, and they merely listen to the statement that C brought the above clacker cker's clacker's clacker, and they merely ruled it as a theft and filed a complaint against C, and the defendant did not have any intention to commit a crime.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendant's charge of the disposal of the cacker cacker in the judgment of the court below is found to be the fact that the defendant transferred the above cacker to another place in order to dispose of the cacker c, and that the defendant transferred the above cacker c to the other place along with C, and that the defendant filed a complaint against the c in the judgment of the court below.

According to the above facts, CA has already been filed prior to the Defendant's accusation.