beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.06.21 2019고단1420

특수절도등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On December 21, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year to a suspended sentence of three months for a violation of the Chemicals Control Act at the Ansan District Court’s Ansan Branch on December 21, 2016, and on July 7, 2017, the same court was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for the same crime at the same court on July 7, 2017, and the said suspended sentence became final and conclusive on July 11, 2017, and completed the execution of the said sentence at the Ansan Prison on February 8, 2018.

[2019 Highest 1420]

1. On November 26, 2018, the Defendant of Special thief and structure intrusion and AR came to reach the AU convenience point managed by ATS at the time of Sin interest, around 04:30 on November 26, 2018. The Defendant reported the network, thereby infringing upon the convenience shop entrance, and then raid the victim’s market price, which is the victim’s possession, in advance, by intrusioning the convenience shop door into the above convenience point, and then raid the victim into the door, and raid the building managed by another person.

2. On November 27, 2018, the Defendant entering a special larceny and structure and AR reached the AU convenience store managed by the said victim ATR around November 27, 2018. On the basis of the network, the Defendant reported the network, opened the entrance door of the above convenience store that had already damaged the correction device and intruded inside, and then placed in a bank prepared in advance for 30 boxes of tobacco, 1 salary paper, and 1 cans of drinking water in the market value of the victim’s possession, which is the victim’s possession, in which the Defendant had already damaged the correction device, and infringed on the said structure managed by another person.

[2019 Highest 2288] On November 23, 2018, the Defendant posted a text of sales of mobile phones at AV sites, and made a false statement to the victim AW who contacted the Defendant that “AW will sell Aphone6S mobile phones.”

However, the defendant did not have a DNA 6S mobile device, and even if he receives the price from the victim, he sent a DNA 6S mobile device.