However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 02:40 on May 4, 2018, the Defendant: (a) started from the road in front of the Csung Party located in the Sinsi-si B; and (b) was driving the Froccodo-B-B-In-house under the influence of alcohol level of 0.204% from the total of 5.3km to the Ari-dong-Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-In-Road-In-House-In-House-In-House-In-House-In-House-In-House-

2. On May 2018, the Defendant is searching for driving under the influence of alcohol on the Internet immediately after the control of a violation of the Road Traffic Act as described in paragraph (1) as an early police officer.

On the other hand, the Defendant, including the Defendant’s wife, was asked to make a statement to the investigation agency as if the Defendant was driven by Defendant’s wife G rather than the Defendant’s wife.

On May 4, 2018, the Defendant stated that G was present at the Defendant’s house located in He, 2018, stating that “N was driven by NN and the CCTV storage period may expire after the search and seizure of the Internet,” and that he was present at the police until the CCTV storage period expires. On June 4, 2018, the Defendant stated that Ne-gu I and E was present at the early police officer on the witness of NN as of May 4, 2018, and that he was present at NNI and E after the workplace, and that G consented to this, the Defendant continued to make a statement to the investigation agency on the part of NNI on June 2018 and proceeded with the investigation. Accordingly, the Defendant also requested that NNI make a statement to the effect that he was driven by NN on the part of the police officer on the part of his husband, and that the Defendant continued to make a statement on the part of his workplace and on the day of his late 2018.