If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

At around 05:10 on September 17, 2016, the Defendant: G, a police officer belonging to the Suwon Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving a report in relation to the Defendant’s studio D and the Defendant’s studio E on the front of Suwon-gu Suwon-si, was on board the patrol vehicle as if the Defendant was the victim of the instant case.

The Defendant continued to know that the Defendant was the victim of the instant case, who was demanded from the said G to leave the patrol car to the said G, set up a door door of the patrol car to close and close the door by putting the front door of the patrol car to start after getting off the patrol car, and prevented the Defendant from departing from the front of the patrol car to start after getting off the said G to stop down.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties on the criminal investigation by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the third trial date);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police statement concerning G;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of punishment (the selection of fines in consideration of the fact that police officers are not recognized, the degree of violence against police officers is not much serious, the age, environment, circumstances, etc. of the defendant);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;