If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

1. Around September 2, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement with regard to the victim B that “The victim will work as a Ddac employee operated by the victim on the face of 2 million won in advance at the accommodation of the Defendant, Nam-gu Defendant C at the time of port.”

However, even if the victim receives the advance payment, there was no intention or ability to work as an employee.

The Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim, received two million won as a prepaid payment from the victim on the same day.

2. Around August 10, 2012, the criminal defendant against the victim E made a false statement to the victim that “The victim would work as a Gambling employee operated by the victim of the victim’s permanent residence at “Gamba” in the “Gamba,” which is operated by the victim of the victim’s permanent residence.”

However, even if the victim receives the advance payment, there was no intention or ability to work as an employee.

The Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim, received two million won as a prepaid payment from the victim on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements of B and E;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;