[criminal history] On July 16, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of five million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Gwangju District Court's support on July 16, 2014. On August 27, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months and 2 years of suspended execution for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

[2] Although Defendant 1 had been punished on more than two occasions due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving of alcohol), Defendant 2 driven Epoter truck from the Defendant’s house located in Gun Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant in the first trial record;

1. Report on the circumstances of driving a drinking driver, report on the circumstances of a drinking driver, notification of the results of regulating the driving of drinking, and inquiry into the results of regulating the driving of drinking;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, and a copy of the judgment;

1. Article 148-2(1)1 and Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act regarding criminal facts, and Article 148-2(1)1 and Article 44 of the same Act on the grounds of sentencing of sentence for sentencing of imprisonment has the record of being punished not less than twice due to drinking driving, and in particular, even if a suspended sentence was sentenced due to the crime of drinking driving, etc., the period of the suspended sentence has not yet passed, and therefore, the Defendant committed a drinking crime as stated in the judgment below.

The Defendant was driving a motor vehicle over a relatively long distance with a significant alcohol concentration in blood.

The defendant was exposed to the police officer's control in the state where the accident occurred even though he did not occur even though he was constantly driving, there was a risk of being able to lead to a big accident if he continued driving while driving.

The defendant, through the two-time fine and the one-time suspended sentence, drives the drinking again after receiving a severe warning of the risk of driving the drinking, the alcohol concentration, driving distance, and the risk of the crime of driving the drinking.