2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

The status of the parties is that the Plaintiff is operating a sexual surgery (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff Council member”) under the trade name of “D Council member” in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the Defendant is a person who received a visual and visual surgery from the Plaintiff Council member as follows:

Around May 2013, the Defendant, who performed each of the instant operations, was provided medical treatment and sex counseling with the Plaintiff’s Council members, and the Plaintiff was provided with a crypology surgery seven years prior to another hospital, and the Defendant was provided with a crypology surgery on January 2013, and was provided with a crypology surgery.

On May 18, 2013, the Plaintiff performed comelting surgery (hereinafter “the first surgery”) against the Defendant by inserting the solid container type to the Defendant by inserting them and transplanting ears. On June 7, 2013, the Plaintiff performed the first surgery with respect to the Defendant by lowering the existing snow bridger and correcting the external sewage. On June 7, 2013, the Plaintiff performed a snow booming surgery by cutting off the existing snow bridger, correcting the external sewage, and then combining it. In addition, at the first surgery, the Plaintiff performed the first surgery to correct the location of the actual container type inserted into the cos (hereinafter “the second surgery”). In addition, when referring to the first surgery, the Plaintiff performed the first operation with respect to each of the instant operations.

After the process of each of the instant surgery and the Defendant’s present state, the Defendant was provided medical treatment at the Gelim University Dental Hospital located in Gangdong-gu Seoul, Gangdong-gu, Seoul on June 14, 2013. At the time, the Defendant suggested that he/she was able to look at the eye of the both sides, and removed the dye between bale and baleing the eye.

On June 14, 2013, the defendant complained for a musta, etc., and applied the F. F. F. F. E in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to take a brue X-ray in its place, and was prescribed by antibiotics, salting agents, etc.

On June 17, 2013, the defendant, who was located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G G, was located in HH visa test and was taking a non-alley CT photograph at that place.

The defendant on July 16, 2013.