beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.04.24 2013고단246

공무집행방해등

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for eight months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 00:05 on December 11, 2012, the Defendants jointly followed three police officers, including the victim E (the age 26) who was a policeman belonging to the Gwangju Western Police Station D District, which was called for by the Defendant’s husband and wife after receiving a report of dispute by the Defendant’s husband and wife at the Seo-gu Seoul District Office 614, and attempted to show the Defendant A’s corridor as a corridor when soliciting the Defendant to return home to the Defendant, the Defendants met the victim’s chest by two descendants, and the Defendant B mets the victim’s chest on several occasions, and the victim’s breasts were pushed back by hand, and plucked up the victim’s bridge twice with the second hand, and interfered with the performance of duties, excluding the legitimate public design and maintenance of order.

2. Defendant B:

A. On December 11, 2012, around 01:30, the Seoul Western Police Station D District District District of the Gwangju Seo-gu Police Station: (a) forged a signature for the purpose of exercising by signing a “F” on the confirmation column of the certificate of arrest of flagrant offenders in order to conceal the fact that the person was designated as a fine unpaid at the D District District of the Gwangju Seo-gu Police Station; (b) forged the signature for the purpose of exercising by signing the “F” on the confirmation column of the certificate of arrest of flagrant offenders; and (c) issued

B. On December 11, 2012, at around 07:42, the Seoul Western Police Station’s criminal office and office, signed “F” in the signature column of the suspect interrogation protocol prepared in the name of “F” and forged the signature for the purpose of exercising the signature. The police officer, who knew of the forgery, issued the suspect interrogation protocol to H as if he/she was duly signed and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Statement of a police interrogation protocol (29 pages), written confirmation, and application of the current Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Defendant A of the relevant criminal facts: Article 2(2) and (1)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 of the Criminal Act.