임대차보증금반환
All appeals filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) against the principal lawsuit and counterclaim of this case are dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the principal office.
1. The reasons for the conclusion of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: “A evidence Nos. 2, 7, 13, and 14 and testimony of witness G” in Section 4 of the judgment of first instance are as follows: “A’s evidence Nos. 2, 7, 13, and 14; G’s testimony of witness of the first instance trial; and part of witness H of the first instance trial witness of the first instance trial; “(e)” in Section 12 following the fifth of the judgment of first instance, even though the Plaintiff’s assertion that there was insufficient meals, i.e., poor meals, or child abuse in the “F Child Care Center,” which the Defendant had been in the past operation of the Child Care Center, appears to have been difficult for the Plaintiff to recruit children; and the Defendant also recognized that there was a little number of stories about reduction of rent between the Plaintiff and the aforementioned Child Care Center around June 2016.
In the above group, I participated in the consultation for brokerage and purchase and sale of child care centers, and I seems to assist in deriving the agreement of this case, such as providing advice on the reduction and exemption plan for the normalization of the operation of child care centers for the plaintiff who had difficulties in soliciting children.
Except for the addition of “the grounds for the judgment of the first instance,” this shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.