If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

At around 19:00 on December 15, 2012, the Defendant, even though there was no fact that the victim D, the president of the apartment housing council, received money and valuables from the play-based construction company, the Defendant damaged the victim’s reputation by openly offering false information by openly delivering one copy of the recording stating, “At each company, 200,000 won, 1,000 won, has been known to him/her,” which is the purport that he/she received money from the play-based construction company.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. An interrogation protocol of the accused or F by the prosecution (including the substitute part);

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Inducements, public announcement of the results of each council of occupants' representatives, and photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report (to attach data submitted by a complainant);

1. Relevant Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;