However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

On June 4, 2014, at around 00:35, the Defendant: (a) reported that he was engaged in a guard on the road in front of the “C” located in the Mapo-si, Yongsan-gu, Changwon; (b) and (c) the circumstances and circumstances of the police box belonging to the Mapo-dong Police Station D, which was called the above E and F, without any reason when the Defendant confirmed whether or not the Defendant’s pro-Japanese activities are carried out by the Defendant, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of the winners by assaulting the above E and F, by using the sciffly reducing the e by hand, and sificings.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (6-1-4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6-1-1-4 months), i.e., the basic area of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6-1-4 months). [Determination of sentence] In order to establish the legal order of the State and eradicate the light of public authority, it is necessary to strictly punish the crime of obstruction of official duties. However, in order to establish the law and order of the State and eradicate the light of the public authority, the defendant is against his mistake and is against himself, and