2. The judgment of the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case as crimes of this case, and the defendant is relatively short of the period in which the defendant operated each of the game of this case. However, when the illegal game room operated on the ground of his unemployment shop was controlled, the defendant operated the illegal game room on the ground of another place more than five months thereafter, and the investigation was conducted, and the crime of aiding and abetting criminals was not good, and the crime was committed. The illegal game room business has serious social harm, such as causing home wave, by causing the ordinary people to go away from the game, and it is not easily eradicated despite continuous crackdown, so there is a need to punish it. The defendant has already been subject to suspended sentence for crimes of this case, the considerable amount of each of the game of this case has already been detained by the defendant, but the defendant's H was again detained at another place, and the investigation was conducted, and the crime was committed on the ground of his unemployment, and it seems that the defendant's motive and behavior were not excessive before and after the suspended sentence, and the defendant's punishment was too unfair.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.