When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 20:40 on April 30, 2018, the Defendant lent KRW 200,000 to the wife of the victim D (ma, 59 years of age) prior to the instant “C agency” located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and discovered that only a part of it was repaid and locked, and that the victim was fluenced in a fluencing state, and that the victim was fluenced, and that the victim was fluced by fluencing her fencing the victim’s fluencing mind, and that the Defendant sustained the victim’s fluencing part of the victim’s flucing part of the flucing part of the fluenced part

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Photographs of the victim and the written diagnosis of injury;

1. Investigation report (in the case, CCTV analysis) (the defendant and his defense counsel did not establish the part of the victim's neck because the defendant was unsatisfy, and denies the victim's injury by asserting that the victim was satisfyed, but it is sufficiently recognized that the defendant was satfying the victim's diving and satfying the victim's satfy, considering the police of the witness D and the evidence submitted by the prosecution together with the statements in this court, and it is sufficiently recognized that the defendant was satfying the victim's diving and s

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;